Subscribe / Unsubscribe for KRC Inc. Newsletters

Frequently asked questions

Question:

It seems to me that companies need professionals with at least 5 years of Canadian experience
only and QA management is becoming more emergency service for problem
businesses.

Answer:

 
You now, some one said: "You are aloud to wish..." But the fact is that there are much fewer specialists with 5 years experience out of job to fill out their positions.
I understand your concerns regarding years of experience. This is how we recommend to handle it: you should find in your previous occupation as many elements of QA as you can, and you have to claim in the beginning of your resume that you do have some years of experience in QA (not necessarily in pharmaceutical industry), there is no specialist that doesn't have experience with quality systems... So your resume won't look unacceptable right away because of lack of experience. Then, you will add new projects with us building your experience in work with preparation of practical projects. Also, even though, some employers say they need 2-3 years of experience it doesn't mean you shouldn't  apply for these positions. When we have advertised our QA ad you think we got many experienced candidates? Not at all. Most of candidates don't know what QA is about. And the same happens to other employers. So, your resume would  attract their attention, if it will be edited according to my advices.
 
Of cause, we are not a huge company, and we don't have other choice than to hire only the most experienced and successful candidates or some freshmen, but who have a really high motivation!
Although, hopefully, we are not the only company who hires in clinical research. If you would have had a chance to attend a job fair on Sep 18, 2003 held by Clinical Research Association of Canada, you could see how our graduates were quite popular among pharmaceutical recruiters and employers.
The best benefit of studding with us is the fact that we are not educational institution, but contract research organization (one of your potential employers). Mainly, we do research and programs for QA had developed on the basis of training for prospective employees.
But look, sometimes just knowing some people in the industry can get you a  great job. At least, this is the way how it works in Toronto. Once I read in Toronto Star that more than 90 % positions are filled upon personal references, and after 8 years
in  this area I can say: it is true.
 
The most important thing is that you get reference letters from us on your project
participation adjusted to your needs and reflecting all appropriate details
of your active participation in full-scale research projects. Without proper
reference letters it is completely useless to approach any serious pharmaceutical company in order to get a job as QA. You get perpetual support of our  centre staff when you mention our institution in your resume as a place
where your potential employer could obtain references. Almost always, prospective employer would make a call to collect references in personal phone conversation. When your prospective employer will call us for
reference, we would reflect all the details of your  participation and appropriate qualifications. This could drastically increase your chances
to get a job in QA. You get active help in your new resume preparation. Remember, your resume is the first step to get a job.
And as you see, you get on average every two weeks letter from us including fresh   QA Positions that you can apply for.
If you ask about our successful graduates. Recently, my student got a contract with  for 3 years full time job , and I remember him expressing the same concerns like you do now.
Last week I got a message from one graduate , he asked to change something in the reference letter and to fax it to his new employer, and by the way wrote : "thanks!" - he got a job. This is the problem, students not always inform me when they get a job. Last week Kelly Scientific Resourses (one of the major Canadian recruiters that we work with) recruiter asked us to find a candidate for entry position. When our secretary called the graduates most were unavailable because they got a job. Again, may be not all of them got exactly the job they wanted, the fact is nobody was available for some entry position. Today I got a message two girls that where my students got a job in pharmaceutical company.

.